Supreme Court Ruling On The Legal Definition Of A Woman
The strange alliance between TERFs & tradcons.
Tradcons everywhere drool in admiration for uber-TERF JK Rowling, despite having diametrically opposed political views, but united in their disdain for ‘transgender males’ (those born male) and opposed to them gaining access to female entitlements (perish the thought…), support structures and ‘women-only spaces’, yet still willing to accommodate Lez & Bi/Trans females…
*******
*******
Is it reasonable to exclude people who may have lived as women for years from female spaces and support networks, etc.? Many are outwardly indistinguishable from women in appearance and/or demeanour, regardless of gender-affirming surgery/hormone-therapy. Are the red-blooded men cheerleading for the TERF agenda fully aware of what it could mean for them...? :-)
Are we supposed to believe that trans males, those only attracted to men, are more of a threat to women's spaces than lez, bi/trans females? Sounds a tad discriminatory...
The trans phenomenon covers a broad spectrum, but the promotion, politicisation, hyperfocus and ultimate weaponization of the trans minority (through media and education) would inevitably lead to the backlash and current misframing of trans people in populist circles, resulting in even greater social friction…
*******
What can be more Clownworld than tradcons backing and celebrating alongside radfems, who tend to have a low opinion of men in general, but especially of conservative men…? Principles are easily discarded when there are a few political points up for grabs...
*******
‘Rights’ often translate into ‘intersectional privilege’ that less fortunate people are forced to pay for...
Women live longer, get more investment in healthcare, are more likely to attend university, and numerous other advantages, yet female campaign groups still demand more... But concessions don't come free, and women's greater access to resources and preferential treatment in areas such as employment, etc. has relegated many males to a socio-economic underclass. Benefits often replace dads and steady relationships.
When trans became politicised, with the potential for 'transgender males' to gain access to female entitlements, support structures and ‘women-only spaces’, certain affluent females felt ‘disempowered’… In recent years this has become more apparent in sports, but it matters not even if a contestant has BOTH male and female biological attributes; if women feel cheated then men have to come charging in to the rescue, fulfilling their perceived 'white-knight' obligations...
So apart from certain sports, the campaigners for the new ruling appear to have no rational motives other than prejudice, and, dare I say, ‘trans-envy’. A cynic might conclude that this is also a underhanded form of man-bashing… :-)
*******
*******
Is JK Rowling really the champion of freedom that many dissidents like to believe? She supported the global Covid-jab rollout, was involved with a Syrian regime-change PR operation, is fully onboard with ‘Project Ukraine’, is said to be the 4th most important “Zionist influencer” in the world, and played a major role in the smear campaign against political leader Jeremy Corbyn. There is also her longstanding friendship with former prime minister Gordon Brown (the geezer who sold off our gold reserves cheaply), both have publicly expressed contempt for ‘little Englanders’ and Brexit.
I think there’s some powerful Harry Potter magic going on here... :-)
*******
*******
*******
